<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court Overturns FCC Net Neutrality Ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.knightcomm.org/court-overturns-fcc-net-neutrality-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.knightcomm.org/court-overturns-fcc-net-neutrality-ruling/</link>
	<description>A project of the Aspen Institute and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 09:32:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Share your thoughts on FCC&#8217;s &#8220;Third Way&#8221; Broadband Framework &#124; KnightComm</title>
		<link>http://www.knightcomm.org/court-overturns-fcc-net-neutrality-ruling/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>Share your thoughts on FCC&#8217;s &#8220;Third Way&#8221; Broadband Framework &#124; KnightComm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 22:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.knightcomm.org/?p=3337#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>[...] in order to preserve the consensus on the FCC&#8217;s Net Neutrality role. In the wake of the Comcast ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, this third way approach would return the consensus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in order to preserve the consensus on the FCC&#8217;s Net Neutrality role. In the wake of the Comcast ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, this third way approach would return the consensus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

